Legal Opinion

In re McIntosh

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1908Published

Application by Janet McIntosh to compel Charles N. Ironside, an attorney and counselor at law, to pay over certain funds in his possession, alleged to be the property of petitioner.

1Opinion of the Court

' GIEGERICH, J.

It appears from the submitted that the respondent, an attorney at law, took, as trustee for the petitioner, a chattel mortgage on certain chattels upon which he has collected $121, which he refuses to pay over after demand duly made. It further appears that the client resided and still resides without the state; that the attorney acted in a professional capacity with reference to her affairs in this state; that he had sole charge and control of her interests here; that the chattel mortgage was taken by him as trustee, while acting for her in a professional capacity, and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. ErbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Sheehan v. ErbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. People ex rel. White v. FeenaughtyNew York Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Claim of Grant v. ChesterNew York Supreme Court · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API