Jones v. Lustig
City of New York Municipal Court
Appeal from a judgment, entered on a verdict, and from two separate orders denying a motion for a new trial after the verdict, and denying a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtConlan, J.
We will dispose of the questions presented on this appeal in their reverse order, and first as to the motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence and surprise. Newly-discovered evidence in no sense means evidence that was known to he in existence, and which, for some unknown or unexplained reason, was not presented at the trial. Even if it were impossible to have secured the evidence, whether by subpoena or under a commission, does not make it newly-discovered, if the facts were known at or before the trial of the action. If offered at a later stage of the case, upon the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Evans v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Hart v. Ithaca ConservatoryNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- La Vetra v. Fraternal Club Sicania, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1926