Legal Opinion

Shields v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1925No. 8. Div. 256PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The defendant, under the undisputed evidence in this case, was clearly entitled to the general affirmative charge, and it was error to a reversal for the court to refuse it. It would be unconscionable to permit a judgment of guilt to stand where the judgment is based upon such evidence as adduced upon this trial. Admitting as being true every statement made by the witnesses for the state, there is an absolute lack of evidence to connect the defendant therewith. In other words, if the evidence discloses that a crime had been committed, aside from the fact that said offense was perpetrated in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pippin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Ex Parte MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Lakey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Moore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Abrams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baugh v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Bryant v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Pinkerton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Booker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Green v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API