Legal Opinion

In Re Kirk-Murphy Holding, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida

Decided May 24, 2004No. 14-31176PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order Denying Sanctions

LEWIS M. KILLIAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS MATTER came on for hearing on May 12, 2004, on the Alleged Debtor’s Motion for Sanctions, Pursuant to Rule 9011 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Against Taco Bell Corp., Taco Bell of America, Inc., White & Case, LLP, and Stephen M. Corse, Esquire. This matter is a core proceeding and this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). After review of the record, case law, and the oral and written arguments of the parties, the Alleged Debtor’s Motion for Sanctions will be DENIED.

FACTS

An Involuntary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Glatter v. MrozCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Barber v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Davis v. CarlCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. VanDanacker v. Main Motor Sales Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Allied Interstate, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  2. Robinson v. ALUTIQ-MELE, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
  3. Cox v. Swiss-American, Inc. (In re Affiliated Foods Southwest, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API