Legal Opinion
In Re Manufacturers Trading Corp. Kiersted v. Hadden (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 17, 1952No. 11291_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
194 F.2d 948
In re MANUFACTURERS TRADING CORP.
KIERSTED,
v.
HADDEN (two cases).
Nos. 11290, 11291.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
As Amended March 17, 1952.
Feb. 5, 1952.
Seth C. Taft, Cleveland, Ohio (Jones, Day, Cockley & Reavis, all of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.
B. B. Fensterstock, New York City (L. C. Wykoff, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief, Arter, Hadden, Wykoff & Van Duzer, Cleveland, Ohio, Zalkin & Cohen, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.