Legal Opinion

Krank v. Nichols

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Sfc. Louis Circuit Court. cited McCartney v. Alderson, 45 Mo. 35 ; Spaulding v. Mayhall, 27 Mo. 377 ; Heed v. Bell, 26 Mo. 216; Pentz v. Knester, 41 Mo. 447 ; May v. Luckett, 48 Mo. 472 ; Higgins v. Turner, 61 Mo. 249 ; Turner v. Baker, 64 Mo. 245. cited May v. Luckett, "48 Mo. 474, and 54 Mo. 437.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.

This is an action of unlawful detainer. In December, 1873, the plaintiff borrowed $800 of defendant Nichols, for which he executed five several promissory notes, and a deed of trust securing them on the premises in controversy, situate in the city of St. Louis. In October, 1874, plaintiff moved to a farm in the country, leaving the premises in charge of defendant Nichols as his agent, with authority to rent, keep in repair, pay taxes, etc., and to account to plaintiff for any surplus of collections. In 1876, plaintiff requested Nichols to rent or lease the premises to Dr. Robinson. Nichols…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pentz v. KuesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  2. May v. LuckettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  3. May v. LuckettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burdette v. CorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Redman v. PerkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Voigt v. AveryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Holden Building & Loan Ass'n v. WannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API