Legal Opinion
Garrett v. Kuehne & Nagel, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 14, 2004No. 3D03-177Published
1Per curiam
Affirmed. See and compare Benjamin v. Biel, 831 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Barbour v. Brinker Fla., Inc., 801 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Barton Protective Servs., Inc. v. Faber, 745 So.2d 968 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Joseph F. Maimone Sec. and Investigations, Inc. v. American Exp. Travel Related Servs., 598 So.2d 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Shilling, 374 So.2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barbour v. Brinker Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Barton Protective Services, Inc. v. FaberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. ShillingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Benjamin v. DielDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Joseph F. Maimone Security & Investigations, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992