Legal Opinion

Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal Revenue v. George E. Mauk and Rosemary Mauk

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1969No. 26244PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, District Judge:

The District Court granted the taxpayer-plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and the District Director of Internal Revenue appealed.

The only issue on appeal is whether payments made by George Mauk, the taxpayer-husband, to his former wife, pursuant to the provisions of an agreement entitled “Separation and Property Settlement Agreement” and a divorce decree, are deductible as alimony under Section 215(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 1 as claimed by taxpayers on their original income tax returns, or whether, as the District Director contends, the payments…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James B. Taylor and Tevis Bennett Taylor v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hoeme v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  2. Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  3. Hesse v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  4. William L. Riley and June E. Riley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  5. Benedict v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API