Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal Revenue v. George E. Mauk and Rosemary Mauk
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, District Judge:
The District Court granted the taxpayer-plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and the District Director of Internal Revenue appealed.
The only issue on appeal is whether payments made by George Mauk, the taxpayer-husband, to his former wife, pursuant to the provisions of an agreement entitled “Separation and Property Settlement Agreement” and a divorce decree, are deductible as alimony under Section 215(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 1 as claimed by taxpayers on their original income tax returns, or whether, as the District Director contends, the payments…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- James B. Taylor and Tevis Bennett Taylor v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hoeme v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- Hesse v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- William L. Riley and June E. Riley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Benedict v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.