Legal Opinion

Secor v. Oregon Improvement Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1896No. 2182PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Richard Osborn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

Appellant is the widow of William Secor, and as such, and as the guardian ad litem of *36her minor child, brought this action to recover damages sustained by reason of the death of her husband, which was due to a casualty occurring in the coal mines of the respondent located at Franklin, as a result of which calamity thirty-seven lives were lost. A statement of the circumstances attending the disaster is set forth in the case of Pugh v. Oregon Improvement Co., 14 Wash. 331 (44 Pac. 547).

The pleadings in the present case are, with the exception…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. GilliamWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Pugh v. Oregon Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Bankers Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Ellefsen v. WiltWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hughes v. Oregon Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Aris v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Denny v. KleebWashington Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API