Legal Opinion

Neumann v. Kurek

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank W. Harris,

for the defendant Figge & Hutwelker Co. Pécora, J. This is an application by the plaintiffs in an action to recover damages for breach of warranty, (1) to strike out as void a judgment for costs entered in favor of the defendant Kurek; (2) to declare the jury’s verdict a nullity, and (3) to direct a retrial of the issues. The motion is made “ upon the sole ground that the said purported verdict and the judgment entered thereon is contrary to and violative of section 2 of article 1 of the Constitution of the State of New York and section 463-a of the Civil Practice Act, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cancemi v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. People Ex Rel. Comaford v. . DutcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Moot v. . MootNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Baird v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Giovanniello v. GermerothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kardibin v. Associated HardwareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Waldman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Phillips v. Meadow Garden Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Ashdown v. KluckhohnNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lewis v. VargasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API