Legal Opinion

Commercial Union Fire Insurance v. Capouano

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 3, 1937No. 11890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

Morris Capouano and his wife brought suit against the Commercial Union Eire Insurance Company upon a policy of fire insurance. The defendant answered, setting up a violation of the following provisions of the policy: “This policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void . . if the hazard be increased by any means within the control or knowledge of the insured; . . or if there be kept, used, or allowed on the above-described premises, benzine, benzole, dynamite, ether, fireworks, gasoline, greek fire, gunpowder exceeding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Farmers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Queen Insurance v. Van GiesenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Commercial Union Fire Insurance v. CapouanoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams MacHine & Tool Company, Inc. v. Mfb Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Adams MacHine & Tool Company, Inc. v. Mfb Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Goldman v. Piedmont Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  4. Goldman v. Piedmont Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API