Searight v. Craighead
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
IN error. Error to the court of common pleas of Cumberland county. This case, the facts of which are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court, was argued by who cited Yea. v. Fouraher, 2 Bur. Rep. 1099. Wisier’s Ex’rs v. Gray’s Adm’rs, 5 Bin. 583. Sluby v. Chomplin, 4 John.
Read the full summary
IN error. Error to the court of common pleas of Cumberland county. This case, the facts of which are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court, was argued by who cited Yea. v. Fouraher, 2 Bur. Rep. 1099. Wisier’s Ex’rs v. Gray’s Adm’rs, 5 Bin. 583. Sluby v. Chomplin, 4 John. R. 461. Morns’ Lessee v. Vanderin, 1 Dali. 65. Miles v. Moodie, 3 Serg. who referred to Fries v. Boiselet, 9 Serg. ¿c Ramie, 129. Eckert v. Wilson, 12 Serg. dy Razde, 393. Weister's Adm’rs v. Gray’s Adm’rs, 5 Bin. 573. Slocum v. Perkins, 3 Serg. Sp Razóle, 295.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.
The original action was brought by the paintiff in error against the defendants, on the 11th of December, 1823, to *136recover the value of certain goods sold and delivered. The' defendants pleaded non assumpserunt, and non assumpserunt infra sex annos. Issues were joined, and, at the trial, a verdict was returned for the defendants, and judgment thereon rendered. Certain points had been presented to the court, to the answers to which, exceptions were taken by the plaintiff’s counsel, and are now assigned here for error.
Two errors have been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Clementson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
- Jones v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813
- Fries v. BoisseletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1822
- Eckert v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1825
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.