Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Emerson C. Custis Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1939No. Appeal, 41PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Rhodes, J.,

As the appeal in this case was not taken to this court within three calendar months of the last definitive and final order of the court below, appellee’s motion to quash must prevail. By the Act of May 11, 1927, P. L. 972, No. 464, §1, 12 PS §1136, an appeal had to be taken within three calendar months from the entry of the order.

The proceedings involved the revocation of a real estate broker’s license, and the appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, and the appeal therefrom to this court had been purportedly taken pursuant to the provisions of section 10…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bailey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Meitner v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Rumsey's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Henry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Estate of Rachel C. Finley CoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gordon v. TomeiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Hanna EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Escheat of $92,800Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Erie v. Piece of Land, Etc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. In re National Wood Preservers, Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API