Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Industrial Accident Board

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1935No. 7,410PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Granite county.

Andrew Ryan was employed by the Montana state highway commission on the main through highway No. 10. The employees of the state highway commission are enrolled under plan 3 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Rev. Codes 1921, sec. 2990 et seep) and the Industrial Accident Fund is the insurance carrier. On July 24, 1933, Ryan was working at a point near the town of Drummond picking up rock along the highway. There were five or six other men similarly employed at intervals not far from where Ryan was working. The weather…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Moffett v. Bozeman Canning Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. King v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State ex rel. Rau v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Wiggins v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. Taber Tank Lines, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ross v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Sullivan v. Roman Catholic BishopMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Young v. Liberty National Insurance CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Hines v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API