People v. Cole
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John M. Leventhal, J.
In American jurisprudence, an acquittal of criminal charges does not signify that the acquitee did not actually commit the crime (United States v Watts, 519 US 148, 155 [1997]; People v Horne, 97 NY2d 404, 413 [2002]). A “not guilty” verdict indicates that the government has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed one of the elements of a crime (id.; see also People ex rel. Matthews v New York State Div. of Parole, 58 NY2d 196, 203 [1983]). Conversely, a “guilty” verdict only indicates that the government has proven…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jacob Lee Schmidt v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Kersey v. HatchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Friedman v. RehalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Montoya v. UlibarriNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.