Bare v. Bare
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Davis District Court. — Hon. W. I. Babb, Judge. This is an action for tbe partition of real estate. There was a petition of intervention filed by George F. Bare, in which he claimed an interest in the land. A demurrer to the petition of intervention was sustained, and the intervener appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtNotebook, J.
1 The facts in the case, as appears from the petition of the plaintiff and the petition of intervention, are as follows: Thomas Bare died in the year 1874, seized of one hundred and eighty acres of land. He left a last will and testament, by which he devised to his wife, Mary A. Bare, all of his property, “to have and to hold the same during her lifetime,” and to his children all the real estate that he died seized of, subject to his wife’s life estate. After the death of the testator, G-eorge P. Bare, one of his sons, conveyed to W. N. Bare all his interest in said land. It is averred in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Butterfield v. WicksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Daugherty v. DaughertySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Potter v. WorleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Corriell v. HamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- Clark v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Estate of StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Archer v. BarnesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Estate of Franke v. WiegandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Warner v. HamillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Bailey v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.