Wolfe v. Light
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentKnudson, Judge
I am unable to agree with the opinion of the majority wherein they have incorrectly applied the rules relating to judgment notwithstanding the verdict, negligence, contributory negligence and proximate cause in this case. In holding the plaintiff con-tributorily negligent they have invaded the province of the jury.
A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, in effect, calls for a review of the trial court’s ruling in denying the motion for directed verdict made at the close of all the evidence. Such motion brings before the trial court, for a second time, questions raised by the motion…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Leonard v. North Dakota Co-Operative Wool Marketing Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Kinnischtzke v. City of Glen UllinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Wolff v. LightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Weber v. United Hardware & Implement Mutuals Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.