Wakefield v. Queisser

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellees in, their motion for rehearing reassert the proposition presented in their original brief that appellant is not entitled to maintain this suit for the reason that he failed to take judgment in the original sequestration suit instituted by the appellees against him. In addition to the authorities cited in the original opinion, which we think are decisiye, we note Jacobs et al. v. Daugherty, 78 Tex. 682, 15 S. W. 160; Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Texas Land & Mortgage Co., Limited, 40 Tex. Civ. App. 489, 90 S. W. 197; Wilson et al. v. Dickey, 63 Tex.…