Ard v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of second degree murder and duly sentenced. He appeals. We reverse.
The warning requirements of Miranda v. State of Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, are well known. Essentially we determine here if a confession made prior to the Miranda decision which is offered in evidence at a trial held subsequent to Miranda must meet the Miranda requirements in order to be admissible. The confession in question was received in evidence over objection despite the fact that it was not in compliance with Miranda. This was error.
Although it was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Reddish v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- State v. ArdSupreme Court of Florida · 1970