Legal Opinion

Jett-Wood Central Mercantile Co. v. Pringle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1929No. 28,460PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The errors alleged in this case are the exclusion of evidence and the sustaining of the demurrer of the plaintiff to the defendant’s evidence in an action on a note where the execution of the note was admitted and the defendant assumed the burden of proof in making a defense to the note. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff on the note, and defendant appeals.

The plaintiff introduced the note and rested. It was signed on the back, “The Merc. Co., E. L. Morgan, Mgr.,” and on the face, “Robt. Pringle, Pres.,” and was made payable to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. City of McPherson v. StuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Berg v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Home State Bank of McPherson v. McBrideSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Nutter v. BlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Julien v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Rosedale State Bank & Trust Co. v. StringerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  3. Andrews v. HeinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Electronic Realty Associates, Inc. v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
  5. Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. HockenbargerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API