Legal Opinion

Dolney v. Lahammer

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided November 8, 1999No. Civ 96-1030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MORENO, United States Magistrate Judge.

(¶ 1) In this civil rights action, defendant, Patricia Jean Lahammer, f/k/a Patricia Dolney, (hereafter Lahammer) moved for summary judgment and plaintiff, Dominic Dolney, (hereafter Dolney) opposed the same. The Motion was heard on November 5, 1999 via telephone conference hookup. Having considered all of the records on file herein as well as the statements and arguments of counsel, the Court, for the reasons articulated below, dismisses the action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), but without prejudice.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dible v. SchollDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
  2. Coger v. Poplar Bluff Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
  3. Hines v. KaemingkDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
  4. Johnson v. McQuistionDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
  5. Jones v. LopezDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API