Legal Opinion
State v. Martello
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 2002No. 2001-1048PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 398.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MARTELLO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Martello,
2002-Ohio-6661.] Criminal law—Parole—Postrelease control—R.C. 2967.28(F)(4) does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the United States and the Ohio Constitutions. (No. 2001-1048—Submitted April 9, 2002—Reargued November 13, 2002— Decided December 13, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County, No. 2000-A-0026. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT R.C. 2967.28(F)(4), which specifies that a person released…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BrewerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MirandaOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.