Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Emerson v. Board of Aldermen of Buffalo

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from special term', Erie county. Application for mandamus by the people ex rel. George D. Emerson against the board of aldermen of the city of Buffalo. Emm an order granting a peremptory mandamus, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

The questions presented to the special term by the application for the writ of mandamus in this case were (1) whether the provisions of the revised charter of the city of Buffalo, (chapter 105, Laws 1891,) relating to the inspectors of election in that city, had the force of law; and (2) whether they were capable of enforcement by the means adopted in this proceeding. We think both of these questions were correctly answered in the affirmative, and that the order was properly made from which this appeal was taken. The facts involved were not in dispute. The questions presented related mainly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The People v. . the Supervisors of ChenangoNew York Court of Appeals · 1853

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Cropsey v. HylanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. People ex rel. Smith v. McFarlineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Pfaus v. FederNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. People ex rel. Decker v. ParmeleeNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. Dunham, New York County Courts1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API