Legal Opinion

Glassner v. Kaufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, entered on October 1, 1963, appointing a temporary receiver of partnership property, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion for a receiver is denied. The appointment of a receiver of a going concern is a drastic remedy, and can properly be invoked only where there is a clear evidentiary showing of the necessity for the conservation of property and the protection of the interests of the litigant (S'. Z. B. Corp. v. Ruth, 14 A D 2d 678). In this action for the dissolution of a partnership and for an accounting,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Modern Collection Associates, Inc. v. Capital Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Groh v. HalloranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Hahn v. GarayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Friedman v. RaginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Modern Telecommunications, Inc. v. DalessandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API