Legal Opinion

Prolerized New England Co. v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 12, 1982No. 82-1209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

This is a proceeding brought by Prolerized New England Company and CNA Insurance Company (hereinafter jointly Prolerized) pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 921(c) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) to review a decision of the Benefits Review Board, Miller v. Prolerized New England Co., 14 Ben.Rev.Bd.Serv. (MB) 811 (1981). The Board’s decision affirmed the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) finding that the claimant was covered under 33 U.S.C. § 902(3).1 Prolerized stipulated that its facility was a covered “situs” within the meaning of 33 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prolerized New England Company v. Benefits Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goode v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 1986
  2. Prolerized New England Company, Cna v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API