Legal Opinion

Baker v. Iancu

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 2019No. 4:19-cv-00289Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DONALD L. BAKER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-CV-0289-CVE-FHM ) ANDREI IANCU, Director USPTO, ) DREW HIRSHFELD, Comm for Patents, ) USPTO, ROBIN O. EVANS, Dir, Tech Center ) 2800, USPTO, ELVIN G. ENAD, Supervisory ) Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2837, USPTO, and ) MARLON T. FLETCHER, Primary Patent ) Examiner, Art Unit 2837, USPTO, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Now before the Court is Defendant the United States of America’s (USA) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 14). Plaintiff alleges that five employees of the United…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union v. Continental Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API