Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Mayer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 16, 2009No. 07-30274Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge KOZINSKI,

with whom Judges REINHARDT and W. FLETCHER join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc:

This is a train wreck in the making.

The panel cleaves a formerly uniform doctrine — the Taylor categorical approach — into two branches. One approach for most things; a separate, incompatible version for a single clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act. This approach is novel, difficult to administer and will encourage future panels to splinter the categorical approach into even smaller pieces. That’s not all: The panel also reads ACCA’s residual clause so broadly that nearly…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API