Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of Oklahoma City
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1983No. 81-1316PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Bailey M. Smith brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Oklahoma City and four individual police officers. He alleged that his arrest by the police officers for outstanding parking tickets violated his constitutional rights because the arrest was unlawful and the arrest warrant was invalid. During trial the police officers were dismissed as parties to the action. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Oklahoma City. Smith raises two issues on appeal. He argues (1) that the judge should have *786directed a verdict in Smith’s favor because the arrest was made…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. August Edward Schartner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Dana Bruce SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. Keystone Steel Fabrication, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Garcia v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Willis Ray Triplett v. Leflore County, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Ross v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Ross v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Garcia v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.