Legal Opinion

Smith v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 22, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00053Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION PERRY SMITH and THERESA SMITH, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CASE No. 3:20-cv-00053-JD-MGG ) METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND ) CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Pending and ripe before the Court is the Motion to Compel Discovery [DE 27] filed on November 23, 2020, by Plaintiffs Perry and Theresa Smith (“the Smiths”). Through their Motion, the Smiths seek complete responses from Defendant, Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”),1 to their Rule 33 Interrogatories…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Kim Patterson v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. John Balderston and John Gabriel v. Fairbanks Morse Engine Division of Coltec Industries, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API