Legal Opinion

United States v. Celestin

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 14, 2010No. 09-1161PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

Jude Celestin was convicted by a jury for bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 371. He appeals that conviction on multiple grounds. First, Celestin contends that the district court abused its discretion in trying Celestin jointly with a codefendant. He asserts that the introduction into evidence of his nontestifying codefendant’s confession violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause and Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), and that he suffered irreparable prejudice as a result of his…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Bucci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Tiem TrinhCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. MubayyidCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. LindleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API