United States v. Celestin
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
Jude Celestin was convicted by a jury for bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 371. He appeals that conviction on multiple grounds. First, Celestin contends that the district court abused its discretion in trying Celestin jointly with a codefendant. He asserts that the introduction into evidence of his nontestifying codefendant’s confession violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause and Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), and that he suffered irreparable prejudice as a result of his…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Bucci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Tiem TrinhCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MubayyidCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. LindleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.