City of Purcell v. Hubbard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
The City of Purcell, herein referred to as defendant, or the City, has appealed from a judgment rendered upon a jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor, in an action brought to recover damages to realty. A single issue is dispositive of the appeal, so that extended recitation of the pleadings and evidence, and/or discussion of the different assignments of error is unnecessary.
Plaintiff sued to recover damages occasioned by fire which escaped onto his property from a particularly described, contiguous tract owned by defendant. There was an open ditch upon defendant’s land which was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Kokomo v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Page v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Manhattan Const. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Markwardt v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- State ex rel. Remy v. AgarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Champlin Petroleum Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Swart Ex Rel. Swart v. City of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Opinion No. 75-170 (1975) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.