Legal Opinion

City of Purcell v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1965No. 40681PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The City of Purcell, herein referred to as defendant, or the City, has appealed from a judgment rendered upon a jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor, in an action brought to recover damages to realty. A single issue is dispositive of the appeal, so that extended recitation of the pleadings and evidence, and/or discussion of the different assignments of error is unnecessary.

Plaintiff sued to recover damages occasioned by fire which escaped onto his property from a particularly described, contiguous tract owned by defendant. There was an open ditch upon defendant’s land which was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Kokomo v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Page v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. Manhattan Const. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Markwardt v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Remy v. AgarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Champlin Petroleum Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Swart Ex Rel. Swart v. City of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Opinion No. 75-170 (1975) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API