Huening v. Shenkenberg
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
As is conceded in defendants’ brief, the question at issue is whether . fence posts and trees, removed by defendants constituted an obstruction in a street, and the *178answer to that question depends upon whether a motion, adopted on December 8, 1925, by the village board of Waterford, to “narrow River street to thirty-eight feet,” legally resulted in the vacation of an eleven-foot strip on each side of the sixty-foot street so as to cause the eleven-foot strip, abutting on plaintiff’s land, to revert to him, as the abutting owner, free from the easement of public travel.
On a plat recorded in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Town of Rensselaer v. LeopoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- State ex rel. Funke v. BurgesonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- State ex rel. Schroeder v. BehnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Town of Vernon v. Waukesha CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Look v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Miller v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Weber County v. Ritchie Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
- (1974), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1974