Legal Opinion

Huening v. Shenkenberg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

As is conceded in defendants’ brief, the question at issue is whether . fence posts and trees, removed by defendants constituted an obstruction in a street, and the *178answer to that question depends upon whether a motion, adopted on December 8, 1925, by the village board of Waterford, to “narrow River street to thirty-eight feet,” legally resulted in the vacation of an eleven-foot strip on each side of the sixty-foot street so as to cause the eleven-foot strip, abutting on plaintiff’s land, to revert to him, as the abutting owner, free from the easement of public travel.

On a plat recorded in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Town of Rensselaer v. LeopoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State ex rel. Funke v. BurgesonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State ex rel. Schroeder v. BehnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Vernon v. Waukesha CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. Look v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  3. Miller v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Weber County v. Ritchie Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. (1974), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API