Legal Opinion

Franks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1912No. A-1176PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tulsa County; T. L. Brown, Assigned Judge. Fred Franks was convicted of assault with intent to kill, and appeáls.

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The plaintiff in error, Fred Franks, was convicted in the district court of Tulsa county at the December, 1910, term on a charge of assault with intent to kill.

When the case was called for trial, the accused filed the following motion for continuance:

“Fred Franks, being first duly sworn, on his oath says: That he is the defendant in the above-entitled cause. That in said cause he is charged with the crime of assault with intent to kill one Geo. Eoff, and that one of the defenses therein will be self-defense, and the material issue therein will be whether or not the defendant was assailed or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chenault v. Eastern Kentucky Timber & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wingfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Brantley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Raper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Hommer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Compton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API