Legal Opinion

Belisle v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 22, 1973No. Docket No. 6233-70Unpublished

Held: Petitioner did not incur a theft loss in 1968. Held, further: Petitioner was not a head of household as defined in section 1(b)(2) in 1968.

1Opinion of the Court

R. L. BELISLE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Belisle v. Commissioner

Docket No. 6233-70.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1973-10; 1973 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 275; 32 T.C.M. (CCH) 35; T.C.M. (RIA) 73010;

January 22, 1973, Filed

Held: Petitioner did not incur a theft loss in 1968.

Held, further: Petitioner was not a head of household as defined in section 1(b)(2) in 1968.

R. L. Belisle, pro se.

Richard H. Gannon, for the respondent.

IRWIN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

IRWIN, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $1,859.11 in petitioner's income tax for 1968. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hopkins v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API