Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Opp

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

This is an action for money,- founded upon a written contract, as modified by an oral agreement. Verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.

The defendants’ mine, known as the “Opp Mine”, for about 20 years was dormant and nonproductive. The timbers in the tunnels had rotted, the tunnels had caved in, and many of the portals had caved in and were grown over with brush.

On June 24,1929, the defendants, who were husband and wife, entered into a written contract with the plaintiffs, who were husband and wife, of the following purport: The parties of the first…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McLeod v. DespainOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Cranston v. West Coast Life Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Baker v. SeaweardOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Grover v. Hawthorne EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hillyard v. HewittOregon Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Valdin v. HolteenOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Start v. Shell Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pokorny v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Durnford v. WordenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Silvertooth v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API