State v. Bryson
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Carey, Judge:
Guessford’s written confession, standing alone, was concededly inadmissible. State v. Prettyman, 6 Boyce 452, 100 A. 476; State v. Frantz, 2 W. W. Harr. 225, 121 A. 652. It was admitted upon the theory that it formed the necessary predicate to a possible implied acquiescence in its truth by Bryson, the Court then being of the opinion that the statement attributed to him could be deemed an evasive answer. With respect to this part of the case, the Court used these words in its charge to the jury:
“You will recall that there was testimony to the general effect that this statement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- O'Hearn v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Godwin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1910
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- State v. BlackburnDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SazamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Benoit v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Downing v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963