Legal Opinion

United States v. Gimbel

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 12, 1985No. 84-CR-10PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

CURRAN, District Judge.

I

Background and Procedure

On January 17, 1984, the grand jury returned a sixteen-count indictment against the defendant, Stanley P. Gimbel, charging him with multiple criminal violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 1 & 1001 2 and 31 U.S.C. § 5313 3 & 5322. 4 Count One of the indictment states that Gimbei, an attorney who represents clients in criminal and tax matters, knowingly, willfully and intentionally falsified, concealed and covered up by a scheme and device material facts which are within the jurisdiction of an agency or department of the United States…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanley P. GimbelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Wesley BuceyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. GimbelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
  4. United States v. James J. BelcherCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. RikyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API