First Capital Mortgage Corp. v. Union Federal Bank of Indianapolis
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY
Must Illinois courts allow a private right of action under a federal statute that provides for such a right? The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (the Act) (47 U.S.C. §227(b)(3) (2000)) establishes a private right of action for its violation “if otherwise permitted” by state court rules. We hold that the Act requires Illinois courts to allow a private right of action unless a neutral rule of judicial administration bars the cause. Because we find no applicable rule that bars the cause of action here, we find that the plaintiff has a right to pursue a claim under the Act.
In 2004 First…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Missouri Ex Rel. Southern Railway Co. v. MayfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- MLC Mortgage Corp. v. Sun America Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Blount v. StroudAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Italia Foods, Inc. v. Sun Tours, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Channon v. Westward Management, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- Italia Foods, Inc. v. Sun Tours, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.