Legal Opinion

First Capital Mortgage Corp. v. Union Federal Bank of Indianapolis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 2007No. 1-06-0459PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

Must Illinois courts allow a private right of action under a federal statute that provides for such a right? The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (the Act) (47 U.S.C. §227(b)(3) (2000)) establishes a private right of action for its violation “if otherwise permitted” by state court rules. We hold that the Act requires Illinois courts to allow a private right of action unless a neutral rule of judicial administration bars the cause. Because we find no applicable rule that bars the cause of action here, we find that the plaintiff has a right to pursue a claim under the Act.

In 2004 First…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Missouri Ex Rel. Southern Railway Co. v. MayfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MLC Mortgage Corp. v. Sun America Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Blount v. StroudAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Italia Foods, Inc. v. Sun Tours, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Channon v. Westward Management, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  5. Italia Foods, Inc. v. Sun Tours, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API