Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Fleischman v. Fox

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

.Habeas Cobpus proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

The relator is brought before the court upon a writ of habeas corpus. The defendant makes return that he is held *83by virtue of a commitment by a city magistrate, a copy of which is attached to the return. The return recites that the relator was charged before the city magistrate with being a disorderly person, viz., a person who had threatened to abandon and has abandoned his wife and children without adequate support and in danger of becoming a burden upon the public, and had neglected to provide, according to his means, for his family; that upon examination of said matter in the presence of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Danziger v. Protestant Episcopal House of MercyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. People ex rel. Bungart v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Willett v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Cohen v. Warden of WorkhouseNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  3. People ex rel. Giallarenzi v. MunroNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. ScarposiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1972
  5. People ex rel. Jacobs v. McGirrNew York Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API