Legal Opinion
United States v. Leahy
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 8, 1945No. Nos. 8758, 8759PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
The United States seeks a writ of mandamus, or prohibition, or both, against the United States District Judge for the District of Delaware on the ground that the District Court has no jurisdiction in a suit-brought for the recovery of loss of certain tankers named, for the purpose of this action, “Mulligan” and “Bloom”.1 The petitioner states that the claim on which the principal suit is based is a matter exclusively for the Court of Claims. National Bulk Carriers, Inc., a Delaware corporation and former owner of the vessels, brought suit in the District Court of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Columbian Fuel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Cory v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- United States ex rel. Gigliello v. Sovereign Construction Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1970
- National Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- United States ex rel. M. G. M. Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.