Brooks v. Tinsley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Newnan — Judge Post. February 21, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
Tinsley and others brought suit in the city court of Newnan against Brooks as the maker of a promissory note alleged *269to have been given to .the plaintiffs as the purchase-price of described real estate. Brooks filed a plea alleging that the consideration of the note had entirely failed, because the land for which the note was given had been set apart to the father of the payees of the note as a homestead under the constitution of 1877, and no order of the superior court had. been granted authorizing the sale of the property, and the plaintiffs therefore could not make to him a valid title to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dunagan v. Stadler & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Bartlett v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1870
- Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Hart v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- McManus v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lunsford v. KerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941