People v. Montgomery
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, County of Humboldt. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
1. There was no error in granting leave to the prosecution to interpose a peremptory challenge to the juror Duncan, under the circumstances stated in the bill of exceptions. Under sec. 1068 of the Penal Code, the Court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, may permit a peremptory challenge, even after the jury is sworn; and a fortiori, it may permit it before the jury is sworn, even though the juror is accepted; and it will not be presumed the Court abused its discretion.
2. If the Court erred in permitting the prosecution to put in evidence so much of the dying declaration of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. RathbunNew York Supreme Court · 1839
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. CowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. PeelMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.