Seltzer v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
Sidney and Mary J. Seltzer (appellants) have appealed from a lower-court order .affirming the denial of their application for a variance by the Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board).
The .appellants sought a variance to permit them to use their property located at 1347 Shady Avenue in Pittsburgh as a four-unit multiple-family dwelling, with one unit being reserved in the basement for the caretaker, and to permit their use of an existing carriage house on the rear lot as a one-family dwelling with a two-car integral garage. The area in which the property is located…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Silver v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Everson v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Franklin Towne Realty, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- Overstreet v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Coretsky v. Board of Commissioners of Butler TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Vito v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- McGeehan v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Timber Place Associates v. Plymouth Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.