Legal Opinion
Jones v. Medlock Hall v. Hubbard
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1950No. 3970, 4000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
While separate appeals were taken in these two cases, they present identical questions. They were argued together and will be disposed of in a single opinion. They grow out of agreements executed between all of the owners of the real estate of the North Half of Block 8, Jordan Place Addition, and of Block 13, in Oak Park Addition, to Oklahoma City. The contracts between all the owners of such real estate declared their purpose to be the maintenance of property values for the mutual benefit of all. The two contracts were substantially the same in all material respects and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Randall v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Nougué v. ClappSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Moffett v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Schwartz v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Shipman v. MedlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John H. Gately v. Leonard v. B. Sutton, Otto Moore, Edward C. Day, William E. Doyle, Frank H. Hall, and Francis J. KnaussCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Davis v. LeachDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1954
- Broussard v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1953