Legal Opinion

Hoffeld v. Lindholm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 23, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered September 13, 2010, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to reargue the denial of summary judgment on their claims for breach of contract and account stated, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as nonappealable.

We conclude that despite plaintiffs’ denomination in their notice of motion, the motion at issue was one for reargument (see Fontanez v St. Barnabas Hosp., 24 AD3d 218 [2005]). The denial of a motion for reargument is not appealable (Rosen v Rosenholc, 303 AD2d 230 [2003]).

Were we to consider the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Jones v. 636 Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Fontanez v. St. Barnabas HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Rosen v. RosenholcAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferolito v. VultaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Ferolito v. VultaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API