Moody v. United States
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*185ORDER
HUGH GIBSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is the defendant United States’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of attorneys’ fees. The Court tried this case on January 9-10, 1985 and rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant now contends, inter alia, that plaintiff cannot recover attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, because the defendant’s position was “substantially justified.” This Court agrees.
Procedural & Factual Background
This action arose from the mailing of a rare, antique gold coin on or about December 1, 1981.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Laurence G. Russell, William L. Hanna, and Eddie D. Langwell v. National Mediation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Southern Oregon Citizens Against Toxic Sprays, Inc. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. 341.45 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Shearn Moody, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.