Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1916No. 7162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Indictment for burglary; from Polk superior court — Judge Bartlett. December 6, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.

1. Besides olear and unequivocal proof of the corpus delicti, which was itself sufficient to corroborate the confession made by the accused (Schaefer v. State, 93 Ga. 177, 18 S. E. 552; Wilson v. State, 6 Ga. App. 16, 61 S. E. 112; Allen v. State, 8 Ga. App, 90, 68 S. E. 558), there was abundant circumstantial evidence tending to show that the defendant had been in recent possession of the stolen property, and to otherwise corroborate his confession. See Tolver v. State, 10 Ga. App. 33 (72 S. E. 516); Anderson v. State, 72 Ga. 98 (2); Perry v. State, 110 Ga. 234 (36 S. E. 781); Griner v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Eberhart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  3. McElroy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rantley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Billups v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  5. Millwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API