Frerich v. Farmers Insurance Group

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellants sought reformation of their automobile insurance policy claiming respondent did not make underinsured motorist coverage available to them in violation of Minn.Stat. § 65B.25 (1971). Respondent moved for summary judgment. The trial court found respondent complied with the notice requirement of Minn.Stat. § 65B.25 (1971) and granted summary judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants purchased an automobile liability policy from respondent sometime before 1972. Beginning January 1, 1972, companies issuing automobile liability insurance were required to make…