Legal Opinion

Cox v. Wochos

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1967No. Civ. No. 23927Published

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

Raymond Cox appeals from the judgment determining interests in the estate of Hazel Woehos. Appellant’s sole contention is that the trial court incorrectly construed that portion of the residuary clause of decedent’s will in which she bequeathed half of the residue of her estate. Decedent’s will provided that this portion of the estate should be held in trust for the benefit of her husband, Jacob J. Wochos, during his lifetime, and that upon his death it should be distributed as follows: $25,000 and $5,000 to two specifically named legatees and “The balance . . . , in equal shares, to the then…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Estate of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Martin v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Estate of RauschenplatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Estate of EhrenfelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API