Legal Opinion
(PC) Van Gessel v. Moore
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 13, 2021No. 1:18-cv-01478Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER ALLEN VAN GESSEL, 1:18-cv-01478-DAD-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT RULE 12(b)(1) 13 vs. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANT UNITED STATES BE 14 THOMAS MOORE, et al., GRANTED (ECF No. 24.) 15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 16 FOURTEEN (14) DAYS 17 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Christopher Allen Van Gessel (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403
21…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.